Appeal No. 1997-3253 Application 08/357,196 court states in In re Piasecki, 745 F.2d at 1472, 223 USPQ at 788, the following: The Supreme Court in Graham v. John Deere Co., 383 U.S. 1 (1966), focused on the procedural and evidentiary processes in reaching a conclusion under Section 103. As adapted to ex parte procedure, Graham is interpreted as continuing to place the "burden of proof on the Patent Office which requires it to produce the factual basis for its rejection of an application under section 102 and 103". Citing In re Warner, 379 F.2d 1011, 1016, 154 USPQ 173, 177 (CCPA 1967). We have not sustained the rejection of claims 1 through 20 under 35 U.S.C. § 103. Accordingly, the Examiner's decision is reversed. REVERSED LEE E. BARRETT ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) 10Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007