The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not
written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 20
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte CHIH-WEI D. CHANG, JOEL F. BONEY, and JASPAL KOHLI
____________
Appeal No. 1997-3273
Application No. 08/397,910
____________
ON BRIEF1
____________
Before KRASS, GROSS, and BLANKENSHIP, Administrative Patent
Judges.
GROSS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 1, 2, and 4 through 6. We note that
appellants indicate on page 2 of the Brief that claim 3 has
been cancelled, and we have treated it accordingly.
Appellants' invention relates to a method and apparatus
for prioritizing and handling memory errors. The system
1We observe that on August 1, 2000 (paper no. 18), appellants filed a
waiver of the oral hearing set for September 12, 2000.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007