Appeal No. 1997-3276 Page 5
Application No. 08/478,567
Sato et al. (Sato) 0 354 703 Feb. 14, 1990
(European Patent Application)
Walsh 2 165 420 Apr. 9, 1986
(UK Patent Application)
Matsui 62-157447 Jul. 13, 1987.
(Japanese Patent Application)
Claims 40, 41, and 46-49 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.
§ 103 as obvious over Noto in view of Iggulden. Claim 42
stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as obvious over Noto in
view of Iggulden further in view of Ishizu. Claims 43-35
stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as obvious over Noto in
view of Iggulden further in view of Johnston. Claim 50 stands
rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as obvious over Noto in view of
Iggulden further in view of Matsui.
Claims 40, 41, and 46-49 also stand rejected under 35
U.S.C. § 103 as obvious over Noto in view of Walsh. Claim 42
also stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as obvious over
Noto in view of Walsh further in view of Ishizu. Claims 43-35
also stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as obvious over Noto
in view of Walsh further in view of Johnston. Claim 50 also
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007