Appeal No. 1997-3276 Page 6
Application No. 08/478,567
stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as obvious over Noto in
view of Walsh further in view of Matsui.
Claims 40, 41, and 46-49 further stand rejected under 35
U.S.C. § 103 as obvious over Sato in view of Iggulden. Claim
42 further stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as obvious
over Sato in view of Iggulden further in view of Ishizu.
Claims 43-35 further stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as
obvious over Sato in view of Iggulden further in view of
Johnston. Claim 50 further stands rejected under 35 U.S.C.
§ 103 as obvious over Sato in view of Iggulden further in view
of Matsui.
Claims 40, 41, and 46-49 also stand rejected under 35
U.S.C. § 103 as obvious over either Sato in view of Walsh.
Claim 42 also stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as obvious
over Sato in view of Walsh further in view of Ishizu. Claims
43-35 also stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as obvious
over Sato in view of Walsh further in view of Johnston. Claim
50 also stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as obvious over
Sato in view of Walsh further in view of Matsui. Rather than
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007