Ex parte MEYER - Page 7




          Appeal No. 1997-3282                                                        
          Application No. 08/189,314                                                  


          (column 2, lines 30-47).                                                    


               With respect to independent claim 1, the examiner relies               
          on Shibano to teach all the elements of the claimed invention               
          "except [] the acrylate-based pressure sensitive [sic,                      
          adhesive] (PSA) [being] thermosettable" (answer, page 3).  The              
          examiner introduces Kitano to teach "the advantage of using                 
          epoxy-acrylate thermosetting PSA that exhibits excellent                    
          adhesions, high shear and peel strengths, and excellent                     
          storage properties" (answer, page 3).  The examiner asserts,                
          and the appellant does not refute, that it would have been                  
          obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to "utilize                     
          Kitano's teaching of using a thermosetting PSA comprising [an]              
          acrylate-epoxy blend in the invention of Shibano" (answer,                  
          page 3).                                                                    




               Appellant's primary argument is that Shibano fails to                  
          teach, expressly or inherently, a polyolefin having the                     
          particular CDBI or comonomer/copolymer distribution content                 
          set forth in claim 1 on appeal.  As a general proposition in                
                                          7                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007