Appeal No. 1997-3340 Page 12 Application No. 08/323,500 the invention recited in claim 10, we are constrained to reverse the examiner's 35 U.S.C. § 103 rejection of independent claim 10 and claim 11 which depends therefrom. CONCLUSION To summarize, the decision of the examiner to reject claims 1, 3-9, 14-17, 20, 21, 23- 28, 32 and 34-37 under the first and second paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. § 112, claims 1, 3, 4, 6, 7, 14-17, 20-28, 32, 34-38 and 40 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) and claims 1, 3, 4, 6, 7, 10, 11, 14-17, 20-28, 32, 34-38 and 40 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is reversed. REVERSED IRWIN CHARLES COHEN ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) ) BOARD OF PATENT NEAL E. ABRAMS ) APPEALS Administrative Patent Judge ) AND ) INTERFERENCES )Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007