Ex parte ENGDAHL et al. - Page 12




          Appeal No. 1997-3434                                                        
          Application No. 08/307,075                                                  


               We agree with appellants’ arguments.  Accordingly, the                 
          indefiniteness rejection is reversed because the claims on                  
          appeal set out and circumscribe a particular area with a                    
          reasonable degree of precision and particularity when read in               
          light of the application disclosure as they would be by one                 
          possessing ordinary skill in the art.  In re Moore, 439 F.2d                
          1232, 1235,                                                                 
          169 USPQ 236, 238 (CCPA 1971).                                              























                                         12                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007