Ex parte KING et al. - Page 1

                             THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                                                 
              The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for                              
              publication in a law journal and is not binding precedent of the Board.                                     

                                                                                      Paper No. 38                        

                             UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                    
                                  BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                      
                                              AND INTERFERENCES                                                           
                                        Ex parte CHARLES RICHTER KING,                                                    
                                           PATRICIA SCHRIVER STEEG                                                        
                                               and LANCE A. LIOTTA                                                        
                                               Appeal No. 1997-3461                                                       
                                             Application No. 07/806,932                                                   
                                                     ON BRIEF                                                             
              Before WINTERS, WILLIAM F. SMITH, and ADAMS, Administrative Patent Judges,                                  
              ADAMS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                         

                                              DECISION ON APPEAL                                                          
                     This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C. ' 134 from the examiner’s final                     

              rejection of claims 22, 23, 25 and 26.                                                                      


Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007