Appeal No. 1997-3542 Application No. 08/192,507 deficiencies of the primary references. In view of the above, the rejection of claims 3, 4, 14 and 15 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is reversed. 35 U.S.C. § 103 Claims 5 and 13 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 over Julius and Kung, taken with Lambert and Taylor, as applied to claims 1, 2, 5-7, 11-13, 16 and 17, and further in view of Brady. The examiner relies on Brady for the teaching of the production of radionucleotides for use in diagnostic imaging. The examiner argues that it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the present invention to produce immunotoxins 131 containing radiolabelled I as the cytotoxic agent moiety in view of the demonstrated use 131 of I for this purpose. Having found the primary combination of references to be without proper motivation and that Brady does not cure the deficiencies of the primary references, the rejection of claims 5 and 13 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is reversed. Other Issue We also note that the oath or declaration filed in the application remains defective, as set forth in Paper No. 2, page 3. Should prosecution of the subject 17Page: Previous 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007