Ex parte OVSHINSKY - Page 4




               Appeal No. 1997-3636                                                                                                
               Application No. 08/584,642                                                                                          


               In the present case, the limitations of interest are the first                                                      
               and second steps recited in claim 1 (emphasis added):                                                               
                       melting the first high melting temperature component to                                                     
               form           a molten first component;                                                                            
                       providing a fluidic stream of said molten first                                                             
               component.                                                                                                          
               In attempting to read these steps on Takagi, we do not find,                                                        
               nor does the examiner point out, any express disclosure in                                                          
               Takagi of melting the "first component," i.e., the starting                                                         
               material in crucible 23 (chromium in Example 4).                                                                    
               Alternatively, the examiner has presented no reasons as to why                                                      
               it would be inherent that the Takagi starting material would                                                        
               be melted, but simply makes the conclusory statement that "In                                                       
               any event the Cr of the reference also melts prior to                                                               
               vaporization" (answer, p. 3).  This statement is not                                                                
               persuasive because, with particular reference to Example 4 of                                                       
               Takagi, it does not appear to us that melting of the chromium                                                       
               would necessarily inherently occur, since the temperature of                                                        
               the crucible, given as 1650°C in Table 6, is below the melting                                                      
               point of chromium, 1857 ± 20°C.                 3                                                                   


                       3 CRC Handbook of Chemistry & Physics, 64th Ed. (1984),                                                     
               p. B-10.                                                                                                            
                                                                4                                                                  





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007