Appeal No. 1997-3668
Application 08/395,228
independent claims 1, 10 , 11, 15 and 20. 1
The remaining claims on appeal also contain the
above limitations discussed in regard to claims 1, 10, 11, 15
and 20, and thereby, we will not sustain the rejection as to
these claims.
We have not sustained the rejection of claims 1
through 4, 6 through 18, 20 and 21 under 35 U.S.C. § 103.
Accordingly, the Examiner's decision is reversed.
REVERSED
ERROL A. KRASS )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
LEE E. BARRETT ) BOARD OF
PATENT Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND
) INTERFERENCES
1The language of claim 10 presents some difficulty in
reading smoothly, thus we might suggest placing the clause
“essentially only by four diffusion terminals” after
“electrically coupled”.
-11-
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007