Appeal No. 1997-3678
Application No. 08/485,161
34 through 36 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over
Reeber in view of Chu, and vice versa, and the Marto and
Lepere article and, optionally, the Hesketh dissertation; and
reversed the rejection of claims 1, 3 through 7, 9, and
34 through 36 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being anticipated
or, in the alternative, under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as obvious over
the Marto and Lepere article.
Additionally, we have remanded the application to the
examiner to assess matters discussed above.
13
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007