Appeal No. 1997-3694 Application No. 08/277,013 through the physical properties of electrical circuits to achieve controlled results. Appellant's programmed machine is structurally different from a machine without that program.”) For the reasons above, the rejection of Claims 1, 4, and 6-10 is not sustained. CONCLUSION The rejection of Claims 1, 4, and 6-10 is reversed. REVERSED ERROL A. KRASS ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) PARSHOTAM S. LALL ) BOARD OF PATENT Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND ) INTERFERENCES ) ) HOWARD B. BLANKENSHIP ) Administrative Patent Judge ) -7-Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007