Paper No. 16 THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _______________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES _______________ Ex parte JOHANNES BIRZER ______________ Appeal No. 1997-3743 Application 08/419,166 _______________ ON BRIEF _______________ Before THOMAS, KRASS and DIXON, Administrative Patent Judges. THOMAS, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on the appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 1 through 4 and 9. Since the examiner has allowed claims 1 through 4 at page 2 of the answer, the only claim that remains on appeal is claim 9. Claim 9 is reproduced below: 9. A system for communicating data between a peripheral unit of a modular programmable controller having at least one 1Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007