Appeal No. 1997-3770 Application No. 08/451,888 Finally, it is reasonable to conclude that the teaching in Le Suer for the addition of lubricant additives to molybdenum containing complexes, column 20, lines 60-62, provides sufficient motivation for the addition of both the borated overbased metal salt of Schwind which is useful to assist in the frictional properties, Schwind, column 3, lines 10- 11 and the friction modifiers of Schwind. Based upon these findings, we conclude that the disclosures of Le Suer combined with Butke and Schwind are sufficient to establish a prima facie case of obviousness with respect to the claimed subject matter. We turn next to the rejection of the claimed subject matter over Gallo in view of Schwind and Butke. We find that Gallo discloses a lubricant formulation containing an overbased additive for lubricant oil containing an organic molybdenum complex. The additive has antiwear, friction reducing and antioxidant properties in the lubricant formulations. See Abstract, column 1, lines 10-12 and column 2, lines 1-7. The additive contains between 0.1 and 10% by weight molybdenum. See column 6, lines 56-57. Moreover, we find that the lubricant composition may contain other additives, “having an antiwear, dispersant and antioxidant effect.” See column 6, lines 63-66. It is reasonable to conclude that the specific suggestion in Gallo for the combination with one or more anti- wear lubricant additives provides sufficient motivation to include the additives of Butke which impart improved extreme pressure and anti-wear properties to lubricant 6Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007