Appeal No. 1997-3798 Page 11
Application No. 08/272,018
For the reasons set forth above, the decision of the
examiner to reject claims 1 and 2, and claims 3 to 9, 11 and
14 to 16 dependent thereon, under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is
reversed.2
CONCLUSION
To summarize, the decision of the examiner to reject
claims 2 to 6, 11 and 14 to 16 under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first
paragraph, is reversed and the decision of the examiner to
reject claims 1 to 9, 11 and 14 to 16 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is
reversed.
REVERSED
NEAL E. ABRAMS )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
2We have reviewed Leppanen applied in the rejection of
claim 9 but find nothing therein which makes up for the
deficiencies of Eriksson discussed above.
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007