Ex parte KLINGER - Page 3




          Appeal No. 1997-3801                                                        
          Application 08/397,960                                                      


               1.  providing a set of digital instructions, which                     
          defines the graphic subject matter;                                         
               2.  depositing, by conventional laser printer operations,              
          printing colors on said thermo-mechanically sensitive plastic               
          substrate to form said graphic subject matter;                              
               3.  only partially setting said graphic subject matter by              
          radiant heat;                                                               
               4.  juxtaposing to said substrate, carrying said graphic               
          subject matter, at least a coating film on the printed face                 
          thereof; and                                                                
               5.  bonding said substrate and said face coating film.                 
                                   THE REFERENCES                                     
          Biddle                           3,068,140        Dec. 11,                  
          1962                                                                        
          Ohta et al. (Ohta)               3,811,828        May  21,                  
          1974                                                                        
          Warther et al. (Warther)         4,978,146        Dec. 18,                  
          1990                                                                        
                                   THE REJECTIONS                                     
               The claims stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as                     
          follows: claims 1, 2, 6-11 and 15 over Warther in view of                   
          Ohta, and claims 3-5 and 12-14 over Warther in view of Ohta                 
          and Biddle.                                                                 
                                       OPINION                                        
               We have carefully considered all of the arguments                      
          advanced by appellant and the examiner and agree with                       

                                          3                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007