Ex parte FENWICK et al. - Page 2




            Appeal No. 1997-3837                                                                              
            Application No. 08/269,251                                                                        


                                               BACKGROUND                                                     

                   The appellants’ invention relates to a system for early arbitration for access to the      
            system bus prior to the system determining whether access to the bus in required.  An             
            understanding of the invention can be derived from a reading of exemplary claim 1, which          
            is reproduced below.                                                                              
                   1.    A commander module, coupled to a system bus including system bus control             
            request signals wherein said commander module is associated with one of said system               
            bus control request signals, comprising:                                                          
                   means for determining whether control of said system bus is required; and                  
                   means for requesting control of said system bus, prior to said determining means           
            determining whether such control is required, by asserting said associated system bus             
            control request signal.                                                                           

                   The prior art references of record relied upon by the examiner in rejecting the            
            appealed claims are:                                                                              
            Irwin                            4,703,420                       Oct.  27, 1987                   
            Schanin et al. (Schanin)         5,067,071                       Nov. 19, 1991                    
            Moyer et al. (Moyer)      5,416,910                        May 16, 1995                           
                                                                ( Eff. filing date Mar. 4, 1992)              

                   Claims 1-12 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over                
            Schanin.  Claims 13-14 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over            
            Moyer in view of Irwin.                                                                           
                   Rather than reiterate the conflicting viewpoints advanced by the examiner and the          
            appellants regarding the above-noted rejections, we make reference to the examiner's              

                                                      2                                                       





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007