Ex parte FENWICK et al. - Page 5




            Appeal No. 1997-3837                                                                              
            Application No. 08/269,251                                                                        


            be an acceptable practice to the appellants and to this Board.  We have reviewed the              
            entire cited portion of Irwin and do not find even a hint of suggestion of  the prior or early    
            arbitration as the examiner maintains.  Irwin is concerned with the use of the bus by a           
            coprocessor and preventing the coprocessor from monopolizing the bus and not early                
            arbitration as recited in the claimed invention.  Therefore, we will not sustain the rejection    
            of claims 13 and 14.                                                                              




























                                                      5                                                       





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007