Appeal No. 1997-3886 Application No. 08/232,460 vegetables (see column 2, lines 21-31; column 3, lines 4-12). The results presented in the Declaration fail to show that argon is unexpectedly superior to nitrogen monoxide in the preservation of vegetables. See Table 1 of the Declaration, where nitrogen monoxide (N2O) yields similar results to argon for preservation of three vegetables, with both gases containing carrier oxygen at 8:2 ratios. Declarations under 37 CFR § 1.132 must compare the claimed subject matter with the closest prior art to be effective. In re Burckel, 592 F.2d 1175, 1179, 201 USPQ 67, 71 (CCPA 1979). Any comparisons in such a Declaration must show differences to an appreciable degree such that the difference was actually unexpected. In re Merck & Co., Inc., 800 F.2d 1091, 1099, 231 USPQ 375, 381 (Fed. Cir. 1986). Furthermore, any such comparative evidence must be commensurate in scope or permit conclusions with respect to the scope of the claimed subject matter. In re Boesch, 617 F.2d 272, 277, 205 USPQ 215, 220 (CCPA 1980); In re Payne, 606 F.2d 303, 315-16, 203 USPQ 245, 256 (CCPA 1979). The claimed subject matter includes preservation of vegetables by 13Page: Previous 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007