Ex parte NILSSEN - Page 7

          Appeal No. 1997-3924                                                        
          Application No. 08/571,634                                                  

          Perper actually functions as claimed.  Thus, the examiner has               
          failed to meet his burden, and we must reverse the rejection                
          of claims 28, 29, and claim 30 (which depends from claim 29).               
               Lastly, claim 33 recites a tuned L-C circuit with the                  
          capacitor connected across the AC output terminals, a                       
          limitation for which we found above that the examiner failed                
          to meet his burden to establish a prima facie case.                         
          Accordingly, we cannot sustain the rejection of claim 33.                   


Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007