Appeal No. 1997-3924
Application No. 08/571,634
Perper actually functions as claimed. Thus, the examiner has
failed to meet his burden, and we must reverse the rejection
of claims 28, 29, and claim 30 (which depends from claim 29).
Lastly, claim 33 recites a tuned L-C circuit with the
capacitor connected across the AC output terminals, a
limitation for which we found above that the examiner failed
to meet his burden to establish a prima facie case.
Accordingly, we cannot sustain the rejection of claim 33.
CONCLUSION
7
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007