Ex parte ESMON et al. - Page 1




                The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not                                 
                written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board                                  
                                                                                    Paper No. 23                   

                             UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                             
                                                   __________                                                      
                                 BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                
                                             AND INTERFERENCES                                                     
                                                   __________                                                      
                                         Ex parte CHARLES T. ESMON                                                 
                                              and PHILIP C. COMP                                                   
                                                   __________                                                      
                                              Appeal No. 1997-3951                                                 
                                              Application 08/238,987                                               
                                                   __________                                                      
                                                    ON BRIEF                                                       
                                                   __________                                                      
                Before WILLIAM F. SMITH, SPIEGEL, and ADAMS, Administrative Patent Judges.                         
                WILLIAM F. SMITH,  Administrative Patent Judge.                                                    

                                             DECISION ON APPEAL                                                    


                       This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the final rejection of claims 1                
                through 18.  Subsequent to the final rejection, claims 2 and 9 were canceled.                      


                From the Advisory Action mailed August 29, 1995 (Paper No. 16), and the fact that                  


                                                        1                                                          






Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007