THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written
for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 22
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte KI-HONG KIM
____________
Appeal No. 97-3964
Application No. 08/319,658
____________
HEARD: February 2, 2000
____________
Before THOMAS, HAIRSTON, and JERRY SMITH, Administrative
Patent Judges.
HAIRSTON, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1
through 9. In an amendment (paper number 16) that responded
to a new ground of rejection (Answer, pages 7 through 10),
claims 1 and 3 through 6 were amended.
The disclosed invention relates to a mode discriminating
method and apparatus for discriminating the operating mode of
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007