THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 29
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte SCOTT W. CAMERON
and ALEX ALEGRE DE LA SOUJEOLE
_____________
Appeal No. 1997-3973
Application No. 08/366,561
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before HAIRSTON, BARRETT and LEVY, Administrative Patent
Judges.
HAIRSTON, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1
1 through 4, 6 through 16, 18, 19, 21 through 24 and 26
through 29.
1The examiner mistakenly identified claims 1 through 29
as the finally rejected claims (paper number 13).
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007