THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 29 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES _____________ Ex parte SCOTT W. CAMERON and ALEX ALEGRE DE LA SOUJEOLE _____________ Appeal No. 1997-3973 Application No. 08/366,561 ______________ ON BRIEF _______________ Before HAIRSTON, BARRETT and LEVY, Administrative Patent Judges. HAIRSTON, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1 1 through 4, 6 through 16, 18, 19, 21 through 24 and 26 through 29. 1The examiner mistakenly identified claims 1 through 29 as the finally rejected claims (paper number 13). 1Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007