Ex parte SHINAGAWA et al. - Page 2




          Appeal No. 1997-3993                                       Page 2           
          Application No. 08/462,561                                                  


                                     BACKGROUND                                       
               The appellants' invention relates to an apparatus for                  
          ashing an organic film as part of a semiconductor device                    
          production process.  A copy of the claims under appeal are                  
          contained in the appendix to the appellants' brief.                         


               The prior art references of record relied upon by the                  
          examiner in rejecting the appealed claims are:                              
          Pammer                   3,348,984                     Oct. 24,             
          1967                                                                        
          Berleue et al.                4,088,023                     May             
          9, 1978                                                                     
          (Berleue)                                                                   
          Roop et al.              4,116,016                     Sep. 26,             
          1978                                                                        
          (Roop)                                                                      
          Barbee et al.            4,640,221                     Feb.  3,             
          1987                                                                        
          (Barbee)                                                                    
          McCoy et al.             4,646,630                     Mar.  3,             
          1987                                                                        
          (McCoy)                                                                     



               Claims 8 through 10 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112,              
          second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to                        
          particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter              
          which the appellants regard as the invention.                               







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007