THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 16 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE __________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES __________ Ex parte KOICHI YAMASAKI __________ Appeal No. 1997-3996 Application 08/519,952 ___________ HEARD: JANUARY 11, 2000 ___________ Before JERRY SMITH, FLEMING, and FRAHM, Administrative Patent Judges. FRAHM, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL Appellant has appealed to the Board from the examiner’s final rejection of claims 1 to 18, which constitute all of the pending claims in the case before us. BACKGROUND The subject matter on appeal is directed to a power source circuit for a portable electronic device (i.e., TV, VTR, or phone) having a triangle wave voltage oscillator and a fixed-frequency, 1Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007