Ex parte YAMASAKI - Page 3




               Appeal No. 1997-3996                                                                                                
               Application 08/519,952                                                                                              


               accordance with a result of the comparison;                                                                         

                       a power source for supplying a power voltage;                                                               

                       a switching circuit for switching the power voltage on and off in accordance with the pulse                 
               signal outputted from said pulse width control circuit to provide a power output signal;                            

                       a smoothing circuit for smoothing the power output signal of said switching circuit, and for                
               applying the smoothed output signal as a constant power source voltage to an external circuit, and as               
               the reference voltage to said pulse width control circuit; and                                                      

                       a reference clock signal source in the external circuit providing a reference clock signal at a             
               fixed frequency to the oscillator circuit,                                                                          

                       wherein an oscillating operation of said oscillator circuit is synchronized with the reference clock        
               signal from the circuit.                                                                                            

                       The following references, along with appellant’s admitted prior art of Figure 5 and pages 1 to 3            

               of the specification, are relied on by the examiner:                                                                

               Komori                                4,590,525                              May  20, 1986                          
               Kikuchi                               4,630,000                              Dec.  16, 1986                         
               Driscoll et al. (Driscoll)     4,812,959                             Mar.  14, 1989                                 

                       Claims 1 to 18 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103.  As evidence of obviousness, the                       

               examiner relies upon appellant’s admitted prior art in view of Komori, Kikuchi, and Driscoll.                       

                       Rather than repeat the positions of appellant and the examiner, reference is made to the Brief              

               and the Answer for the respective details thereof.                                                                  

                                                            OPINION                                                                

                       It is our view, after consideration of the record before us, that the evidence relied upon and the          

                                                                3                                                                  





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007