Ex parte COLE et al. - Page 3




          Appeal No. 1997-3997                                                        
          Application No. 08/559,117                                                  


                    a) controllably actuating said actuator to apply a                
          predetermined loading to said cable;                                        
                    b) determining a distance, L  of said actuator                    
                                                2                                     
          controlled fixture from said home position; and                             

                    c) summing said distances L  and L  to thereby1      2                               
          calculate the resultant cable length L.                                     

          The examiner relies on the following reference:                             
          Bonine                        4,562,743          Jan. 7, 1986.              

          Claims 1-14 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103.  As                       
          evidence of obviousness the examiner offers Bonine taken                    
          alone.                                                                      
          Rather than repeat the arguments of appellants or the                       
          examiner, we make reference to the brief and the answer for                 
          the respective details thereof.                                             
          OPINION                                                                     
          We have carefully considered the subject matter on                          
          appeal, the rejection advanced by the examiner and the                      
          evidence of obviousness relied upon by the examiner as support              
          for the rejection.  We have, likewise, reviewed and taken into              
          consideration, in reaching our decision, the appellants’                    
          arguments set forth in the brief along with the examiner’s                  
                                          3                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007