Ex parte UTSUMI et al. - Page 7




          Appeal No. 1997-4018                                                        
          Application No. 08/668,716                                                  


          has failed to establish a prima facie case of obviousness, and              
          we cannot sustain the rejection of claim 13 and its                         
          dependents, claims 14-26.  Additionally, since claim 27                     
          includes all of the limitations of claim 13, the rejection                  
          thereof also must be reversed.                                              
                                     CONCLUSION                                       
               The decision of the examiner rejecting claims 13 through               
          27 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is reversed.                                       























                                          7                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007