THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for
publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 24
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_________
Ex parte PETER QUARENDON
__________
Appeal No. 1997-4052
Application 08/479,8931
___________
ON BRIEF
___________
Before URYNOWICZ, THOMAS and HAIRSTON, Administrative Patent
Judges.
URYNOWICZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
Decision on Appeal
This appeal is from the final rejection of claims 21-39, all
the claims pending in the application.
The invention pertains to a method and apparatus for
generating a model of a 3-D region of an object. Claim 21 is
illustrative and reads as follows:
1 Application for patent filed June 7, 1995. According to appellant, the
application is a continuation of Application 08/030,509, filed March 12, 1993, now
abandoned.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007