Appeal No. 1997-4071 Application No. 08/047,511 circumstances is not sufficient." Id. citing Continental Can Co v. Monsanto Co., 948 F.3d 1264, 1269, 20 U.S.P.Q.2d 1746, 1749 (Fed. Cir. 1991). We fail to find that Stinson discloses or suggests a memory divided into a plurality of sections, each section being associated with a specific data processing function for selectively storing sentence entries in each of the memory sections in accordance with the specific data processing function used to generate each sentence entry as required by Appellants' claims. We fail to find that the Examiner has shown that it would be necessary for Stinson to partition Stinson's memory in this way. Therefore, we will not sustain the Examiner's rejection of Appellants' claims. 11Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007