THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 23
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte TADAHIRO OHMI, MICHIO YAMAJI, NOBUKAZU IKEDA,
TSUTOMU SHINOHARA, TETSUYA KOJIMA
____________
Appeal No. 1997-4077
Application No. 08/441,989
____________
HEARD: January 12, 2000
____________
Before McCANDLISH, Senior Administrative Patent Judge and
ABRAMS, and GONZALES, Administrative Patent Judges.
GONZALES, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the examiner’s refusal to allow
claims 1 through 9, as amended subsequent to the final
rejection. These claims constitute all of the claims pending
in this application.1
We AFFIRM-IN-PART.
1While the examiner has approved entry of the amendment after final
rejection (Paper No. 6, filed May 9, 1996), we note that this amendment has
not been clerically entered.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007