Ex parte ATSUMI et al. - Page 5




          Appeal No. 1997-4092                                                        
          Application No. 08/181,404                                                  


          a refresh block 29-31 according to the refresh status data in               
          the nonvolatile flag cell array 32-34, and refreshing data                  
          stored in each memory cell of the selected refresh block 29-                
          31.”  In the absence of evidence in the record, or a                        
          convincing line of reasoning by the examiner, that the start                
          and stop addresses (column 2, lines 40 through 47; column 3,                
          lines 48 through 62; column 4, lines 55 through 66; column 9,               
          lines 3 through 24; column 10, lines 24 through 62; and column              
          11, lines 5 through 8) stored in the registers 11 (Figure 3                 
          embodiment), in the reserved storage locations 32 through 34                
          (Figure 5 embodiment) or in the register storage locations 51               
          through 53 (Figure 6 embodiment) are the same as refresh                    
          status data, we will not sustain the 35 U.S.C. § 102(e)                     
          rejection of claims 1 through 26 and 30 through 51.                         
                                      DECISION                                        
               The decision of the examiner rejecting claims 1 through                
          26 and 30 through 51 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) is reversed.                  
                                      REVERSED                                        




                         KENNETH W. HAIRSTON           )                              
                                          5                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007