Appeal No. 1997-4092 Application No. 08/181,404 a refresh block 29-31 according to the refresh status data in the nonvolatile flag cell array 32-34, and refreshing data stored in each memory cell of the selected refresh block 29- 31.” In the absence of evidence in the record, or a convincing line of reasoning by the examiner, that the start and stop addresses (column 2, lines 40 through 47; column 3, lines 48 through 62; column 4, lines 55 through 66; column 9, lines 3 through 24; column 10, lines 24 through 62; and column 11, lines 5 through 8) stored in the registers 11 (Figure 3 embodiment), in the reserved storage locations 32 through 34 (Figure 5 embodiment) or in the register storage locations 51 through 53 (Figure 6 embodiment) are the same as refresh status data, we will not sustain the 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) rejection of claims 1 through 26 and 30 through 51. DECISION The decision of the examiner rejecting claims 1 through 26 and 30 through 51 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) is reversed. REVERSED KENNETH W. HAIRSTON ) 5Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007