THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 22 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES _____________ Ex parte JAMES D. MAYO and CHENG-KUO HSIAO _____________ Appeal No. 1997-4107 Application No. 08/510,730 ______________ ON BRIEF _______________ Before WARREN, WALTZ, and LIEBERMAN, Administrative Patent Judges. LIEBERMAN, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner's refusal to allow claims 1, 2, 5 through 17 and 19 through 25 which are all the claims remaining in the application. 1Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007