THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding
precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 56
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte LUDWIG SCHUSTER, HANNS-HELGE STECHL
and DIETRICH WOLFF
____________
Appeal No. 1997-4202
Application No. 08/603,197
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before PAK, WALTZ, and LIEBERMAN, Administrative Patent Judges.
LIEBERMAN, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner’s refusal to allow
claims 1 through 5 which are all the claims remaining in the application.
THE INVENTION
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007