identify any difference between the rejected claims and the prior art relied upon and
shall explain how the claimed subject matter is rendered unpatentable over the prior
art. If the rejection is based upon a combination of references, the examiner shall
explain the rationale for making the combination.
DECISION
The rejection of claims 1 through 5 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being
unpatentable over Chemical Abstracts 102: 172028f or Shevchenko is reversed.
REVERSED AND REMANDED
9
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007