Ex parte OVERTURF et al. - Page 1




                    THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                      
          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today                  
          (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and                    
          (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                                  
                                                            Paper No. 16              

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                     __________                                       
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                 AND INTERFERENCES                                    
                                     __________                                       
                             Ex parte JAMES M. OVERTURF                               
                                and CRIS T. PALTENGHE                                 
                                     __________                                       
                                Appeal No. 1997-4219                                  
                                Application 08/315,745                                
                                     __________                                       
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                     __________                                       

          Before KRASS, FLEMING, and RUGGIERO, Administrative Patent                  
          Judges.                                                                     
          KRASS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                         

                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This is a decision on appeal from the final rejection of               
          claims 1, 2, 7 and 9.  Claims 3 through 6 and 8 have been                   
          indicated by the examiner as allowable.                                     


                                          1                                           





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007