Ex parte RUSSELL et al. - Page 2




                 Appeal No. 1997-4285                                                                                     Page 2                        
                 Application No. 08/420,852                                                                                                             


                 under appeal is set forth in the appendix to the appellants'                                                                           
                 brief.                                                                                                                                 


                          The prior art references of record relied upon by the                                                                         
                 examiner in rejecting the appealed claims are:                                                                                         
                 Landreth                                     1,364,387                                             Jan.  4,                            
                 1921                                                                                                                                   
                 Nugent                                       4,536,286                                             Aug. 20,                            
                 1985                                                                                                                                   
                 Pahmeier et al.                              4,724,084                                             Feb.  9,                            
                 1988                                                                                                                                   
                 (Pahmeier)                                                                                                                             
                 Capella                                      4,834,840                                             May  30,                            
                 1989                                                                                                                                   



                          Claims 9 and 10 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112,                                                                         
                 first paragraph, as failing to provide adequate support for                                                                            
                 the invention as now claimed.1                                                                                                         


                          Claims 1 to 3 and 5 to 10 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.                                                                      
                 § 103 as being unpatentable over Pahmeier in view of Capella                                                                           
                 and Nugent.                                                                                                                            

                          1The rejection of claims 1 to 8 under this basis was                                                                          
                 withdrawn by the examiner to reduce the issues on appeal                                                                               
                 (answer, p. 4).                                                                                                                        







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007