The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 53
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte EDWARD W. DUCK, INGOLF SCHEFFLER and KLAUS RUCH
_____________
Appeal No. 1997-4356
Application 08/458,628
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before KIMLIN, WARREN and DELMENDO, Administrative Patent Judges.
KIMLIN, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 10-12,
14, 16-20, 22, 24 and 25, all the claims remaining in the present
application. Claim 10 is illustrative:
10. A non-aqueous sprayable plastisol sound-dampening
composition free of volatile components consisting
essentially of:
a) from about 10 to about 60 percent by weight of
a polymer powder mixture having an average particle
size of less than about 60 microns, said mixture
consisting essentially of
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007