Ex Parte DUCK et al - Page 4




          Appeal No. 1997-4356                                                        
          Application No. 08/458,628                                                  

          composition which incorporates a first vinyl chloride polymer               
          component and a cross-linked swellable second polymer component             
          which is based on the same monomeric constituents as instantly              
          claimed." (page 3 of answer).  The examiner notes that the second           
          polymeric component of Japanese '828 "is a polymethyl methacry-             
          late which is specifically preferred by appellants" (page 3 of              
          answer).  Appellants also do not take issue with the examiner's             
          legal conclusion that the presently claimed average particle size           
          of less than about 60 microns would have been obvious to one of             
          ordinary skill in the art.  Rather, the principal argument                  
          advanced by appellants is that the amount of plasticizer employed           
          in the Japanese composition is "less than the amount employed in            
          the present composition" (page 8 of brief).  According, to                  
          appellants, since Japanese '828 is only concerned with forming              
          polymeric sheets, "there exists no motivation on the part of one            
          having ordinary skill in the art to wish to increase the amount             
          of plasticizer employed in the Japanese reference" (page 8 of               
          brief).  It is appellants' contention that the Japanese reference           
          "clearly teaches away from an increase in plasticizer content               






                                          4                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007