Appeal No. 1998-0147
Application 08/446,278
recited in claims 46-48 and 50, and a headphone jack, as
recited in claims 46 and 49, although these elements are not
expressly shown in figure 2.
The only difference between Kramer and the subject
matter of claims 48 and 49 is that claim 48 recites a memory
card with a built-in memory. As discussed, supra, we
conclude that this difference would have been obvious at the
time the invention was made. The Examiner has established a
prima facie case of obviousness with respect to claims 48
and 49. The rejection of claims 48 and 49 over Kramer is
sustained.
Claim 46 additionally recites "a terminal removably
connected with said server for use in charging said battery
with power from said power supply terminal." Claim 47
recites "a rechargeable battery built therein, and means for
charging said rechargeable battery from a power supply in
said digital signal source when said memory card is
connected with the digital signal source." Claim 50 recites
"a rechargeable battery which is charged by a power supply
in said digital signal source when said memory card is
connected with the digital signal source." The Examiner has
- 13 -
Page: Previous 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007