THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for
publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 28
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte MAMORU NAKANISHI and MORIHIKO TOYOZUMI
____________
Appeal No. 1998-0153
Application No. 08/497,227
____________
ON BRIEF1
____________
Before HAIRSTON, FLEMING, and DIXON, Administrative Patent Judges.
DIXON, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 1-11,
which are all of the claims pending in this application.
We AFFIRM-IN-PART.
1Appellants waived their oral hearing in a letter dated Feb. 28, 2000, therefore this case has been
decided on the brief.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007