Ex parte STEIN et al. - Page 4




          Appeal No. 1998-0183                                                        
          Application No. 08/413,040                                                  


               and decrypting data converted to a binary code;                        
               a means for storing encrypted data for subsequent                      
          retrieval upon demand;                                                      
               a means for selectively storing the transmitted data                   
               in a decrypted form for subsequent retrieval upon                      
          demand; and                                                                 
               a means mounted in said housing for transmitting                       
               program signals to said means for encrypting                           
               and decrypting the data, said means comprising a                       
               keypad with a plurality of command keys and a                          
               visual display operationally connected to the keypad.                  
               The Examiner relies on the following references:                       
          Morgan et al. (Morgan)   4,229,817           Oct. 21, 1980                  
          Goss                     4,956,863           Sep. 11, 1990                  
               Claims 1 to 3, 6 to 10, and 14 stand rejected under                    
          35 U.S.C. § 103 over Goss and Morgan, whereas claims 12 to                  
          13 stand rejected over Goss alone.                                          
               Rather than repeat the positions and the arguments of                  
          Appellants or the Examiner, we make reference to the briefs                 
          and the answer for their respective positions.                              
          OPINION                                                                     
              We have considered the rejections advanced by the                      
          Examiner. We have, likewise, reviewed Appellants' arguments                 




                                          4                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007