Appeal No. 1998-0187 Application No. 08/247,518 main and Reply Briefs (Paper Nos. 34 and 37, filed February 19, 1997 and July 18, 1997, respectively). OPINION In reaching our decision in this appeal, we have given careful consideration to the appellant’s specification and claims, to the applied prior art references, and to the respective positions articulated by the appellant and the examiner. As a consequence of our review, we have made the determinations which follow. Rejection (1) As a preliminary matter, we note that on pages 3 and 4 of the main brief, the appellant has indicated that claims 8-10 and 12-14 stand or fall together as one group. In accordance with 37 CFR § 1.192(c)(7), we select claim 8 as being representative. Independent claim 8 is directed to a process for making a ceramic cup having a body and a handle, comprising injection molding the body and the handle together in a single injection molding operation to form an integral, one-piece, unitary 4Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007