Appeal No. 1998-0241 Page 6 Application No. 08/465,373 direction and in magnitude. The direction of rotation of the fiber can be either clockwise or counterclockwise. The magnitude of rotation is a measure of how much the fiber rotates per unit length of the fiber. While it appears that an "irregularly shaped" glass fiber as used in claim 10 must have a magnitude of rotation which is not constant, but varies both in direction and magnitude along the length of the fiber, we do not agree with the appellants' argument on page 5 of the brief that "[t]he language of the specification clearly states that an irregularly shaped glass fiber comprises two distinct glass compositions with different coefficients of thermal expansion." 6 Rather, it is not clear whether "irregularly shaped" glass fiber also requires that the fiber be a dual-glass fiber or whether this is merely one example of an "irregularly shaped" glass fiber. Therefore, we find ourselves in agreement with the examiner that the phrase "irregularly shaped" is indefinite. For the foregoing reasons, we shall sustain the examiner's rejection of claim 10 under the second paragraph of 35 U.S.C. § 112. The anticipation rejection With regard to the examiner's rejection of claims 1, 2, 4, 6, 9 and 10 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being anticipated by Troth, the appellants' brief (pages 4 and 6-8) argues only claim 6 separately from claim 1. Accordingly, we shall decide the appeal of this rejection as to claims 1, 2, 4, 9 and 10 on the basis of representative claim 1, with claims 2, 4, 9 and 10 6Interestingly, the appellants have not argued, with respect to the rejection of claim 10 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being anticipated by Troth, that the fibers of Troth are not "irregularly shaped."Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007