Ex parte ASCHENBECK et al. - Page 11




               Appeal No. 1998-0241                                                                       Page 11                 
               Application No. 08/465,373                                                                                         


               we shall also sustain the examiner's rejection of claims 8 and 11 as being unpatentable over                       
               Troth.                                                                                                             
                                                        CONCLUSION                                                                
                      To summarize, the decision of the examiner to reject claim 10 under 35 U.S.C.  112,                        
               second paragraph, claims 1, 2, 4, 9 and 10 under 35 U.S.C.  102(b) and claims 8 and 11                            
               under 35 U.S.C.  103 is affirmed.  The examiner's decision to reject claim 6 under                                
               35 U.S.C.  102(b) is reversed.                                                                                    
































Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007