Ex parte DOSHI et al. - Page 9




          Appeal No. 1998-0291                                                       
          Application 08/360,894                                                     



               network may be composed of STM and ATM elements.                      
               Accordingly, there will be a need to develop                          
               technology that will gracefully interface STM                         
               elements with ATM elements and allow ATM type                         
               switches to interface with the different types of                     
               existing signaling networks.  The need for such                       
               interfacing has been recognized, but has been                         
               limited to the transport of user information only.                    
               [Page 3, lines 12-21, emphasis added.]                                
                    Accordingly, Appellants’ arguments regarding the                 
          adaptation of STM networks to ATM networks is not only obvious             
          as reasoned by the Examiner, but is acknowledged as recognized             
          in the art by Appellants’ specification.  Claims 1 and 10 are              
          directed broadly to the concept of interfacing STM with ATM                
          networks and are fully met by the Examiner's rejection. Thus,              
          we will sustain the rejection of claims 1 and 10, under 35                 
          U.S.C.                                                                     
          § 103.                                                                     
                    The details for accomplishing the adaptation are                 
          recited in claims 3 through 6 and 11 through 14.  The Examiner             
          has not rejected these claims on art.  whether or not these                
          details may be inherent in the differences of the STM and ATM              
          protocols, such a rejection is not before us.                              
                    With regard to claims 2 through 9 and 11 through 17              

                                         9                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007