THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 24 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte RICHARD J. WONG ____________ Appeal No. 1998-0338 Application No. 08/350,865 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before THOMAS, JERRY SMITH and HECKER, Administrative Patent Judges. HECKER, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal from the final rejection of claims 1 through 10 and 12 through 23. Claim 11 is indicated as being allowable. As the result of an amendment after final rejection, a rejection under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second paragraph has been dropped , resulting in the allowability of claims 91 1See paper no. 23, mailed Oct. 27, 1998.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007