Ex parte CINI et al. - Page 1




               The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not     
               written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.     
                                                                 Paper No. 29         
                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                      
                                     ____________                                     
                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                          
                                   AND INTERFERENCES                                  
                                     ____________                                     
                       Ex parte CARLO CINI and FABRIZIO STEFANI                       
                                     ____________                                     
                                 Appeal No. 1998-0440                                 
                              Application No. 08/351,578                              
                                     ____________                                     
                                       ON BRIEF                                       
                                     ____________                                     
          Before JERRY SMITH, BARRETT, and GROSS, Administrative Patent               
          Judges.                                                                     
          GROSS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                         



                                  DECISION ON APPEAL                                  
               This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final                 
          rejection of claims 2 through 6, 8, 10, 11, and 13 through                  
          20,  which are all of the claims pending in this application.1                                                                        
               Appellants' invention relates to an output stage for an                
          integrated power audio amplifier.  The device includes a pair               
          of transistors connected in series between a positive and a                 

               An amendment canceling claims 14 and 20 was received with the Brief on1                                                                     
          May 23, 1997, but does not appear to have been considered by the examiner.  
          Accordingly, we will consider claims 14 and 20 in this appeal.              





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007