THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written
for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 20
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte KINNEY C. BACON, HAMAN R. THOMAS, DAVID B. LETT,
ROBERT O. BANKER, AND MICHAEL P. HARNEY
____________
Appeal No. 1998-0460
Application No. 08/480,765
____________
ON BRIEF1
____________
Before THOMAS, BARRETT, and BARRY, Administrative Patent Judges.
BARRY, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134
from the final rejection of claims 12-63 and 68-70. We
affirm-in-part.
1The oral hearing set for February 22, 2000 was waived
by appellants in the facsimile communication received on
February 1, 2000.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007